
August Unemployment Rate Surged
To 6.1%,
a 5-year High
Sluggish growth may delay real estate recovery
09/05/08
-- On Friday, the
labor department
reported that the US
unemployment rate zoomed to a five-year high of 6.1 percent
in August as employers slashed 84,000 jobs. That reinforced
worries that consumers would pull back even more on spending,
including buying a house, and push the economy into a
recession.
To add insult to injury, the jobs market is
expected to get worse before it gets better.
Outplacement consultancy Challenger, Gray &
Christmas recently forecast that “uncharacteristically heavy job
cutting over the summer months could lead to the largest
post-Labor Day downsizing since 2002. The firm adds that if the
pace of the last three months continues through December, annual
layoffs will exceed one million for the first time since 2005.
It’s already the case that some of the
worst "bubble boom" housing
markets and the economy’s geographical weak spots have
unemployment rates well above
the national average.
In the Riverside-San Bernadino-Ontario metro
area in southern California, the median price of an existing
home was down 32,.7 percent from a year ago, as of the second
quarter, based on data from the national Association of
Realtors. The jobless rate there was 8.9 percent in July vs. 4.5
percent in April 2006, around the general peak of the housing
boom.
A slowdown in the massive trade sector of
Southern California, for instance, is having a negative trickle
down effect on that metro area and others.
There are other worrisome signs about the
economy as well as other forces could compound the threat to
housing.
Consumer spending continues to slow. Growth
in that key economic area fell short of 2 percent in the second
quarter for the third straight quarter. According to David
Resler, chief economist at Nomura International, the
four-quarter growth is down to 1.4 percent, the slowest pace
since the fourth quarter of 1991.
“Growth has been slower only during
full-fledged recessions,” Resler noted in a recent analysis.
That weak showing came despite a government
stimulus package that included tax rebate checks, the last of
which arrived in July.
That massive $168 billion plan signed into
law in February, however, did not include conventional measures
such as an extension of jobless benefits and highway
construction funds, which generate jobs and income.
When
Washington finally enacted legislation in late July, it extended
jobless benefits 13 weeks for those who had exhausted the
standard 26 weeks of benefits. The extension, which runs through
March, is less than the last time, such benefits were extended
when it spanned March 2002-December 2003.
The mechanics of the
recent housing rescue package
has also drawn mixed reviews, especially about its potential to
spark sales, which would support prices. Measures for homebuyers
include a small tax deduction and a tax credit of up $7500.
“I think that plan is likely to have very
limited effect,” says housing specialist and professor
Christopher J. Mayer, who is also Vice-Dean of the Columbia
Business School “People need the cash at closing, not when they
file tax returns.
In a recent
study, Mayer is also argues that unusually high
interest rates have been hurting prices, as well as sales
That’s another key to the labor-real estate
market dynamic and a potential break with the past.
Lawrence Wun, chief economist at the National
Association of Realtors, says as jobs disappeared during the
2001 recession, home sales rose just the same because mortgage
rates were falling.
“Rates have a bigger impact,” says Wun. “In
this case, we already have low rates,” says Wun. ”It is likely
rates won't fall as we are losing jobs. It will probably have a
negative impact.”
Rates may be historically low –
averaging about 6 1/2 percent
for a 30-year fixed loan – but the spread is unusually
high.
The spread – or difference between the rate
on a 30-year mortgage and the yield (or interest rate) on the
ten-year Treasury note -- was about one and a half percent, or
150 basis points for most of the decade-long housing boom. In
recent months – despite the Federal Reserve’s aggressive cutting
---it’s been two and a half percentage points or more.
It’s one of the reasons why the
NAR’s affordability index
isn’t higher and recently fell below its level of November 2007,
before the Fed slashed rates and the credit crunch spiraled out
of control.
The interest rate environment is even worse
for jumbo mortgages, the premium for which is running one
percentage point higher than the usual 20-30 basis-point markup.
“I think it’s going to be a while before we
see mortgage rates spreads back to where they were.”
If so, that will depress sales and prices, as
it discourages money-conscious, layoff weary consumers, who are
also facing tougher borrowing standards. Meanwhile, homeowners
who want to sell – or worse, need to sell (perhaps because of
looming foreclosure) – are more likely to be stuck with their
properties.
Source - CNBC